Accra, July , 2024 — In a significant development, the High Court in Accra has taken action to address the unauthorized dissemination of audio recordings from a court session held on June 13. The case, which involves high-profile individuals, has drawn attention due to the leak of confidential proceedings.

Background

During the cross-examination by the Attorney General (AG) today, Deputy Attorney General Alfred Atuah-Yeboah raised concerns about an audio recording circulating on social media platforms. The recording allegedly captured moments from the court proceedings held last week. Justice Afia Serwah Asare-Botwe, a Justice of the Court of Appeal sitting as an additional High Court judge, promptly responded by directing the National Security agency to investigate the source of the leaked recordings.

Key Players

The courtroom was filled with legal representatives and accused parties. Here are the key players involved:

1. Prosecution:

   • Deputy Attorney General Alfred Tuah-Yeboah
   • Deputy Attorney General Diana Asonaba Dapaah
   • Director of Public Prosecution Yvonne Attakora Obuobisa

2. Accused:

   • Richard Jakpa
   • Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson

3. Defense Team:

   • Dr. Abdul Basit Aziz Bamba
   • Thaddeus Sory

Court Proceedings

Following Deputy AG Atuah-Yeboah’s request, Justice Asare-Botwe temporarily adjourned the proceedings and invited all relevant parties into chambers. The accused individuals, Richard Jakpa and Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, joined the meeting alongside their legal representatives. Thaddeus Sory, part of the defense team, also participated.

National Security Investigation

Upon reconvening, Thaddeus Sory requested a brief meeting with Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame, who had arrived during the adjournment. Justice Asare-Botwe then issued a directive to the National Security agency, tasking them with identifying the origin of the leaked audio recordings. The urgency of the situation underscores the court’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings.

Implications

The leak of court recordings raises serious questions about confidentiality, transparency, and the responsible handling of sensitive information. As investigations proceed, legal experts and the public await further updates.

Conclusion

The High Court’s decision to probe the source of the leaked audio serves as a reminder that justice must not only be done but also seen to be done. The outcome of this investigation will have implications for future court proceedings and the protection of legal rights.